
The prosecutor is appealing, or wants a second trial? Double jeopardy limits what the state can do, and the deadlines are short
I am Mitchell Bisson, a Grand Rapids criminal appeals lawyer. I have litigated for over 15 years. This page covers what happens when the prosecution, not the defendant, appeals in a Michigan criminal case or asks for another trial: which rulings the prosecutor can appeal, the deadlines, what double jeopardy forbids, and what happens to bond while an appeal is pending. I represent defendants in that position. I explain where the state’s case for an appeal is strong and where it is weak, and I do not promise outcomes.
The short answer. The people of Michigan may appeal a final judgment or final order of the circuit court as of right, and may appeal other orders by leave, but only if the protection against double jeopardy would not bar further proceedings against the defendant. MCL 770.12(1), (2). A jury’s not guilty verdict and a judge’s directed verdict of acquittal cannot be appealed, even when the judge was wrong. A claim of appeal of right is due within 42 days and an application for leave within 21 days, and both limits are jurisdictional. MCR 7.204(A)(2)(c); MCR 7.205(A)(1)(a). Nothing here predicts how an appeal will come out.
Most prosecution appeals start with a ruling that went the defendant’s way: a dismissal, a suppression order, a refusal to bind the case over for trial, or a sentence below the guidelines. The first question is always whether the state can appeal that ruling at all, and the second is whether double jeopardy would stop the case from going forward even if the appeal succeeds. A defendant who ignores a prosecution appeal because the earlier ruling went their way can lose ground quickly, and a defendant who gets papers from the Court of Appeals should call me right away.
Rulings the prosecutor can appeal in Michigan
| Ruling | How the state can challenge it | Deadline | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Order dismissing the case (circuit court) | Appeal of right, if double jeopardy does not bar further proceedings | 42 days after entry for a claim of appeal | MCL 770.12(1)(a); MCR 7.202(6)(b)(i); MCR 7.204(A)(2)(c) |
| Final order of a district court | Appeal of right to the circuit court, heard by a judge other than the trial judge | 21 days | MCR 7.103(A)(1), (C); MCR 7.104(A)(1) |
| Ruling that suppresses evidence or excludes a witness before trial | Application for leave to appeal, because the order is not final; the application must show how the state would suffer substantial harm by waiting | 21 days | MCL 770.12(2)(a), (c); MCR 7.205(A)(1)(a), (B)(1) |
| Refusal to bind the defendant over after the preliminary examination | A discharge at the preliminary examination is without prejudice to a new prosecution, and a bindover decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion | Depends on the route the state chooses | MCR 6.110(F); People v. Anderson, 501 Mich. 175 (2018) |
| A sentence | A sentence is a final judgment; appeal of right after trial and by leave after a plea | 42 days for a claim of appeal | MCL 770.12(1)(a), (2)(e); MCR 7.202(6)(b)(ii); MCR 7.203(A)(1)(b) |
| Acquittal or directed verdict of acquittal | No appeal; retrial is barred even if the ruling rested on a legal mistake | Not applicable | Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313, 318 (2013); People v. Szalma, 487 Mich. 708, 710, 720-727 (2010) |
| Missed leave deadline | A delayed application may be filed within 6 months of entry of the order | 6 months | MCR 7.205(A)(4)(a) |
A ruling is appealable of right only if it is a final judgment or final order, and for a criminal case the rule names five: an order dismissing the case, the original sentence, a sentence after a resentencing motion is granted, a sentence or order after remand in a prior appeal of right, and a sentence after probation revocation. MCR 7.202(6)(b). A suppression order is not on that list. It is interlocutory, so the state needs leave. If the suppression order leaves the state unable to proceed and the case is dismissed, the dismissal is a final order that the state can take up of right.
The Court of Appeals decides whether to grant leave. It may grant leave to appeal from an order of the circuit court that is not a final judgment appealable of right. MCR 7.203(B)(1). The application is decided on the documents, with no oral argument. MCR 7.205(E)(1). If it is granted, the case proceeds as an appeal of right, and unless the court orders otherwise the appeal is limited to the issues raised in the application and supporting brief. MCR 7.205(E)(3), (4). The defendant may file an answer within 21 days of service of the application. MCR 7.205(C). Because there is no argument, the written answer is the whole opportunity to oppose leave, and I treat it that way.
What double jeopardy protects against
The Michigan and federal constitutions both bar a second jeopardy for the same offense. The Michigan Supreme Court sorts the protection into three parts: no second prosecution after an acquittal, none after a conviction, and no multiple punishments for one offense. People v. Nutt, 469 Mich. 565, 574 (2004); People v. Smith, 478 Mich. 292, 299, 304 (2007). The timing rule is that jeopardy attaches when a jury is selected and sworn. People v. Lett, 466 Mich. 206, 215 (2002). Before that point a dismissal or a suppression order generally leaves the state free to seek review, because no bar has arisen yet.
After the trial begins, the substance of the ruling decides the question. When a judge ends the case midtrial by finding the prosecution’s proof insufficient, that finding is an acquittal, and retrial is barred even if the judge misread the law. Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313, 315-316, 318 (2013), reached that result for a Michigan arson prosecution in which the judge demanded proof of an element the statute does not contain. The Michigan Supreme Court applied the same rule in People v. Szalma, 487 Mich. 708, 710, 720-727 (2010), a first-degree criminal sexual conduct case, and reinstated a directed verdict that rested on a legal error.
Two situations run the other way. If a judge rules for the defense after the jury has returned a guilty verdict, the state may appeal, because winning would simply restore the verdict and no second trial would be needed. United States v. Wilson, 420 U.S. 332, 344-345 (1975). And when the jurors cannot agree, a retrial is allowed under both constitutions. People v. Lett, 466 Mich. 206, 217 (2002).
Double jeopardy attaches to offenses, not incidents. Two charges are different offenses when each has an element the other lacks, so one episode can support more than one prosecution. People v. Smith, 478 Mich. 292, 299, 304 (2007). Separate governments are treated separately too. A state prosecution and a federal prosecution for the same conduct do not bar each other under the dual-sovereignty rule restated in Gamble v. United States, 587 U.S. 678 (2019).
Mistrials and prosecutorial misconduct
A defense request for a mistrial usually leaves retrial open, because the defendant asked for the do-over. The Michigan Supreme Court changed the test in July 2026. In People v. Jennings, Docket No. 165764 (Mich. July 24, 2026), the Court set aside the federal rule that bars retrial only when the prosecutor meant to provoke the mistrial motion, and adopted a broader test under Const 1963, art 1, § 15. Retrial is barred when the mistrial was granted because of the prosecutor’s improper conduct, when that conduct was intentional misconduct the prosecutor knew to be improper and prejudicial and pursued for an improper purpose with indifference to a significant danger of mistrial or reversal, rather than legal error, negligence, mistake or an insignificant impropriety, and when the resulting prejudice could not be cured short of a mistrial. The Court stressed that the burden remains heavy and returned the case to the trial court to reconsider the double jeopardy argument.
That decision is recent, and courts will be working out its edges. If a mistrial in your case followed prosecutor conduct, the record of what was said, what the court ruled and whether the defense objected becomes important, so I get the transcripts first.
Bond and your case while the state appeals
When the state appeals, the default favors the defendant on release. Unless the trial court certifies that the offense, the defendant and the issues make a bail requirement advisable, the defendant may remain free on personal recognizance while the appeal is pending. MCL 765.7; MCL 770.12(3). The order under challenge stays in effect unless a court orders a stay. MCR 7.209(A)(1). A request for bond or a stay goes to the trial court first, and the Court of Appeals will not take it up until that court has ruled. MCR 7.209(A)(2). Once a claim of appeal is filed or leave is granted, the trial court loses the power to set aside or amend the judgment or order on appeal unless the Court of Appeals orders it, the parties stipulate, or other law allows. MCR 7.208(A).
Answers I look at when the prosecutor appeals
Jurisdiction and timing. The rules call the time limits for a claim of appeal and for an application for leave jurisdictional. MCR 7.204(A); MCR 7.205(A). I check the entry date of the order, any motion that could extend the time, and whether the state used the right route.
Double jeopardy. I ask whether jeopardy had attached, whether the ruling was an acquittal in substance, and whether the state is trying to review a ruling the statute does not let it appeal.
Standard of review. Three standards come up. A bindover decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion. People v. Anderson, 501 Mich. 175 (2018), held that the magistrate must weigh all the evidence at the examination, credibility included, and that a reviewing court should leave the decision alone absent an abuse of discretion. A below-guidelines sentence is reviewed for reasonableness because People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 391-392 (2015), made the guidelines advisory, and People v. Lydic, 335 Mich. App. 486 (2021), is a decided prosecution appeal of a sentence below the advisory range. A sentence within the range is different again: the Court of Appeals must affirm it absent a scoring error or reliance on inaccurate information. MCL 769.34(10).
Harm from waiting. On an interlocutory order, the state’s application must set out facts showing how it would suffer substantial harm by awaiting final judgment. MCR 7.205(B)(1). I test whether it has.
How I handle a prosecution appeal
- Calendar the deadlines. I fix the 21 and 42 day dates from the entry of the order, and I confirm whether anything extends them.
- Get the record. I order the transcripts and gather the orders, the register of actions and the briefing from the trial court.
- Decide whether double jeopardy applies. I read the ruling and the record to see whether jeopardy attached and whether the ruling was an acquittal.
- Answer the application. Where the state seeks leave, I file the answer within 21 days of service, because the court decides on the papers.
- Protect your release. I look at bond, any conditions and any request for a stay, and I raise them with the trial court first.
- Keep the trial case ready. I keep preparing for trial or a hearing, because an appeal does not always stop the case.
- Explain the risks. I explain what a reversal would mean, what a denial of leave would mean, and what each choice does to your case.
What I need from you
Bring every paper you received from the court, the prosecutor or the Court of Appeals, and write down the date you received each one. Bring the order the state is challenging, your bond papers and any conditions of release. Tell me your trial court case number, who represented you and whether a jury was ever selected and sworn. Do not discuss the case with anyone connected to the prosecution, and do not miss a court date because an appeal is pending.
Where your Kent County prosecution appeal will be heard
A prosecution appeal from a Kent County circuit court order goes to the Michigan Court of Appeals, and an appeal from a district court order goes to the circuit court, which in Kent County is the 17th Judicial Circuit. MCR 7.203(A), (B); MCR 7.103(A)(1); MCL 600.518. Further review of a matter the circuit court decided on appeal from a lower court is only by application for leave granted by the Court of Appeals. MCL 770.3(4). The trial court keeps authority over bond and stay matters unless the Court of Appeals orders otherwise. MCR 7.208(G). I confirm at the consultation which court holds your file.
Why people hire me for a Michigan prosecution appeal
You work directly with me, the lawyer handling your case. I tell you where the state’s appeal is strong and where it is weak, and what each outcome would mean for your case. I do not promise outcomes. I read the record, calendar every deadline and prepare the answer the court will decide the case on, and then we decide together how to proceed.
Fees depend on the length of the record, the number of issues and whether the state seeks leave or appeals of right. I explain my fee arrangement at the consultation, before you decide whether to hire me.
Questions I hear from people when the prosecutor appeals in Michigan
What is the difference between an appeal of right and leave to appeal in Michigan?
An appeal of right means the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction once an aggrieved party files on time. Leave to appeal means you apply and the court decides whether to hear the case. In civil cases, a final judgment or final order of the circuit court is appealable of right. Non-final orders, circuit court decisions on appeals from lower courts, and plea-based criminal convictions go by application for leave.
Under MCR 7.203(A), the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from a final judgment or final order of the circuit court or Court of Claims, with exceptions. The exceptions include circuit court judgments entered on appeal from another court or tribunal and criminal convictions based on a guilty or nolo contendere plea. Under MCR 7.203(B), leave covers orders that are not final, a final circuit court judgment entered on appeal from another court, final agency orders that are reviewable by the court, and cases where an appeal of right could have been taken but was not filed on time. Applications for leave are decided on the documents, without oral argument, under MCR 7.205(E)(1). If leave is granted, the case proceeds as an appeal of right and no claim of appeal is needed under MCR 7.205(E)(3). Which path applies depends on what the order actually decided, so read the order before counting any deadline.
Can I appeal a Michigan trial court order before the case is over?
Usually only by leave. An order that does not end the case is interlocutory, so you file an application for leave to appeal under MCR 7.203(B)(1) and MCR 7.205. If the order is interlocutory, the application must set out facts showing how you would suffer substantial harm by waiting for a final judgment. The Court of Appeals decides whether to grant leave.
The application is due within 21 days after entry of the order, or within 21 days after an order deciding a timely motion for rehearing or reconsideration, under MCR 7.205(A)(1). It must attach the order, the register of actions, the court’s findings and the transcripts the rule requires, and the other side has 21 days to answer. There is no oral argument, and the court may grant, deny, enter a final decision, or request more material under MCR 7.205(E). If leave is granted, the appeal proceeds as an appeal of right, the docketing statement is due in 28 days, and the other deadlines run from the date the order granting leave is certified. An interlocutory appeal does not stop the case by itself: under MCR 7.209(A)(1), except for automatic stays under MCR 2.614 or MCL 600.867, an appeal does not stay a trial court order unless the trial court or Court of Appeals says so, and under MCR 7.208(F) certain pre-judgment orders, such as orders on the custody, control and management of property, temporary support or custody in a domestic relations action, and preliminary injunctions, stay enforceable pending interlocutory appeal unless a court orders otherwise.
What goes into an application for leave to appeal in the Michigan Court of Appeals, and is there oral argument?
The application states the date and nature of the order, recites the alleged errors and the relief sought, and includes a concise argument on each issue under MCR 7.205(B). You attach the order, the register of actions, any findings, required transcripts, proof of service, and the entry fee. There is no oral argument; the court decides on the documents.
MCR 7.205(B) requires the application to conform to MCR 7.212(B) and (C) for argument and, if the order is interlocutory, to show how you would suffer substantial harm by waiting for final judgment. The required transcripts depend on the issue: the evidentiary hearing for a hearing-based issue, the full jury charge for an instruction issue, the plea and sentencing transcripts for a plea appeal, the sentencing transcript for a sentencing issue, and the portions showing the issue and any objections for other issues. If a transcript is not yet available, you file the reporter’s certificate or an attorney statement and then file the transcript when it is available. The entry fee is $375 under MCL 600.321(1)(a). The other party may answer within 21 days, a reply is allowed under MCR 7.212(G), and under MCR 7.205(E)(4) the appeal is limited to the issues raised in the application and supporting brief unless the court orders otherwise.
What are the standards of review on appeal in Michigan, and why do they matter?
The standard of review tells the appeals court how much deference to give the trial court. Legal questions and summary disposition rulings are reviewed de novo, meaning without deference. Findings of fact are not set aside unless clearly erroneous under MCR 2.613(C). Discretionary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion. MCR 7.212(C)(7) requires each argument in a brief to state the applicable standard.
The Michigan Supreme Court states that the grant or denial of summary disposition is reviewed de novo in Maiden v Rozwood. MCR 2.613(C) provides that findings of fact by the trial court may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and that regard must be given to the trial court’s special opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses who appeared before it. Discretionary rulings are measured by whether the decision falls within the range of reasonable and principled outcomes, as explained in People v Babcock. The same facts can lead to different results depending on which standard applies, so the way an issue is framed can matter. Whether an issue was preserved also changes the standard, because unpreserved claims are often reviewed only for plain error. MCR 7.212(D)(2) requires the appellee to say whether the appellant’s statement of the standard is complete and correct. Identify the standard of review for each issue before deciding which issues to raise.
What is the record on appeal in Michigan, and who orders the transcripts?
Michigan appeals are heard on the original record, which includes the documents filed in the lower court, the transcripts, and the exhibits introduced. The appellant is responsible for securing the full transcript of testimony and other proceedings unless the court orders otherwise; appointed-counsel criminal appeals and child protective appeals follow separate transcript procedures in MCR 6.425(G) and MCR 3.993(E). The court reporter must file a certificate within 7 days after a transcript is ordered and file the transcript within the time MCR 7.210(B)(3) sets.
MCR 7.210(B)(3)(b) sets the transcript filing deadlines after the transcript is ordered: 14 days for a leave application from an order granting or denying a motion to suppress in a criminal case, 28 days in an appeal of a plea-based conviction, 42 days in other interlocutory criminal appeals and custody cases, and 91 days in other cases. The Court of Appeals may extend or shorten the periods. The appellant may ask the trial court, within the time for appeal, to order less than the full transcript, and the appellee may then file omitted portions. If a transcript cannot be obtained, the appellant must file a motion to settle the record, with a proposed statement of facts, no later than 56 days after the available transcripts are filed (28 days in a child custody case or interlocutory criminal appeal), or within 14 days after the claim of appeal is filed if none are available. The trial court then certifies a settled statement. In probate estate, trust and guardianship appeals, only the order appealed and pertinent documents and transcript portions need be included. Facts that are not in the record are generally outside what the court can consider.
What does it mean to be bound over to circuit court in Michigan?
Bindover means the district court judge found probable cause to believe a felony was committed and that you committed it, so the case moves to circuit court. Under MCL 766.13, the magistrate binds you over to appear within 14 days for arraignment in circuit court, or may conduct the circuit arraignment as court rule provides.
A bindover, or a waiver of the preliminary examination, is what gives the prosecutor authority to file an information in circuit court. MCR 6.112 says the prosecutor may not file the information until you have had or waived a preliminary examination, unless you are a fugitive. The court transmits the case file, recognizances, and the register of actions to the circuit court under MCR 6.110(G). If the circuit judge later finds that the district court violated the examination rules, MCR 6.110(H) lets the circuit court dismiss the information or send the case back to district court. A bindover is not a finding of guilt. It means there was enough evidence to proceed, and the real contest over the evidence comes later through motions and trial.
What does abuse of discretion mean when a Michigan trial court ruling is appealed?
Michigan appellate courts say a trial court abuses its discretion when its decision falls outside the range of reasonable and principled outcomes. In People v Babcock, the Michigan Supreme Court explained that when the trial court selects one of those principled outcomes, the reviewing court defers to the trial court’s judgment.
The question on appeal is not whether the appellate judges would have ruled the same way. There can be more than one acceptable outcome, and a trial court does not abuse its discretion by choosing a different principled outcome than the reviewing court would have picked. In practice, this means an appellant challenging a discretionary ruling needs to explain why the decision was outside the range of principled outcomes, not just that it was wrong. In civil cases, MCR 2.613(A) says an error in a ruling is not a ground for a new trial or for disturbing a judgment unless refusing to act appears inconsistent with substantial justice, and in criminal cases MCL 769.26 asks whether the error resulted in a miscarriage of justice, so the appellant must also address whether the error mattered. Look at what the trial court said on the record about its reasoning, because a ruling made without explanation is harder to defend and harder to attack.
How do I appeal a Michigan district court judgment to circuit court?
Appeals from the district court go to the circuit court in the county where the judgment was entered under MCL 600.8342(1). A final judgment is appealable of right, except one based on a guilty or no contest plea, under MCR 7.103(A)(1). The claim of appeal and fee are due within 21 days of entry under MCR 7.104(A) and (B), or within the time a statute or court rule allows. An appeal of right from a possession judgment in a summary proceeding is due within 10 days of entry (MCR 4.201(O)(2)).
To vest the circuit court with jurisdiction, you file the claim of appeal and the circuit court’s appeal fee, unless you are indigent, within the appeal period under MCR 7.104(B). Documents filed with the claim include the judgment, the transcript certificate or a statement that none exists, any bond, and the register of actions. The circuit court hears the appeal on the original record under MCR 7.109(A), and MCR 7.103(C) requires that a judge other than the one who conducted the trial hear it. Under MCR 7.111, the appellant’s brief is due 28 days after the circuit court gives notice that the record is filed, the appellee’s brief 21 days after service, and a reply 14 days after the appellee’s brief. Orders that are not final, and plea-based judgments, are reviewed only by leave, with an application due within 21 days under MCR 7.105(A). A criminal misdemeanor tried in district court has a right of appeal to circuit court under MCL 770.3(1)(b). In a possession case, filing the claim of appeal does not by itself stop an order of eviction; a stay requires a bond or escrow order under MCR 4.201(O)(3).
Related Michigan pages
- Michigan appeals lawyer
- Criminal appeals
- Appeals after a guilty or no contest plea
- Post-conviction relief
- Preliminary exam, discovery and Miranda
I represent defendants when the prosecution appeals in Michigan criminal cases. Contact me 24/7 by phone or email. Your Rights, My Fight! Call for a free initial consultation.
Big-Firm Power. Street-Level Grit.
Law Offices of Mitchell S. Bisson, 2828 Kraft Ave SE, Suite 295, Grand Rapids, MI 49512, serving Kent County and West Michigan.
This page provides general information about Michigan law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.